Another Iowa Case of Piercing the Corporate Veil

One of the reasons that individuals form business entities, such as corporations and limited liability companies, is to protect their own personal assets from the debts and liabilities of the business. The law does provide some protection, but in order to get that protection, the company owners need to follow certain requirements. Fail to follow those requirements opens the individual owners up to liability of the company through a process called "piercing the corporate veil".

The Iowa Court of Appeals recently affirmed a basic case permitting the piercing of the corporate veil. In this particular instance, the individual defendants claimed they were not sufficiently aware that the Plaintiff was pursuing the defendants individually (attempting to pierce the corporate veil) in the lawsuit, rather than suing just the corporation. In the court's ruling, the court found sufficient evidence to put the plaintiff's on notice before the trial that the Plaintiffs intended to pursue them individually.  The defendant's claim of "trial by ambush" was rejected.

This case serves as a reminder to all business owners that the liability protection that can be provided by an entity, such as a corporation or a limited liability company, is only valid if you follow the proper formalities. Failing to keep corporate minutes and records, separate corporate finances, routine government filings and separate books of the business entity can expose the individual owners of the company to the company's liability. Setting up the corporation is only the first step and that step alone does not necessarily provide the corporate liability protection.

Corporate Liability Protection? Maybe.

Many people understand that a corporation or limited liability company can provide its individual owners with protection from the debts of the company.  For example, if a company is unable to pay its vendors, those vendors are typically unable to go after the owners of the company for those debts.  Or if the company borrows money, the lender can only recover the debt from the company and not the owners/shareholders/members, generally.

However, if the owner of the company has provided a personal guarantee to that vendor or any other entity that has provided money or services to the company, the corporate liability protection is meaningless at that point.  Most guarantees don't require that the creditor look to the company first, but could look first to the individual providing the personal guarantee. 

If at all possible, an owner should avoid giving a personal guarantee when entering into any agreements.   Conversely, as a creditor, whenever dealing with a small business with limited operating history, you should demand a personal guarantee from the owner(s) of the company.