The Importance of FLSA Compliance

In a previous post, I mentioned the importance of compliance with FLSA due to recent increase in enforcement efforts by the Department of Labor. One point I mentioned was the need for an employer to understand which bonuses needed to be included in the calculation in the appropriate overtime rate for employees. An illustration of how costly this mistake can be occurred this week. Texas company, Kinder Morgan entered into an agreement with the Department of Labor to pay $830,422 in back wages based on violations of the FLSA, including failure to include bonuses as part of an employee's regular rate. The other violations included failure to pay employees for pre-shift meetings and improper rounding of an employee's work hours. Evenlarge companies like Kinder Morgan make mistakes applying the FLSA. It's worth your time to audit your wage and hour practices to ensure compliance.

What is the Collaborative Divorce Process?

The collaborative divorce process is a relatively new form of conflict resolution. In the collaborative divorce process, each person retains his or her own collaborative lawyer to advise them in negotiating a settlement of all issues. This takes place before either party file for divorce. The goal of the collaborative divorce process is to obtain a settlement of all issues while avoiding the sometimes costly litigation process. Negotiations in the collaborative divorce process take place with both spouses and both lawyers present. Neither party can go to court or threaten to go to court as a means to force a resolution. In the event a settlement cannot be reached and the parties choose to go to court, both must obtain new counsel for the litigation process. The collaborative divorce process is ideal for spouses who communicate well and who are willing and able to work respectfully to try and find solutions to their unique set of issues.     

Wage & Hours Problems

The Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA) can be difficult to understand and apply. Couple that with the fact that the Iowa Wage and Hour Division and the Federal Department of Labor are increasing their enforcement efforts and it becomes clear that employers need to ensure their compliance with wage and hour laws. There are a few troublesome areas for many employers:

1.      Classification of employees: Employees can be classified as exempt (meaning overtime pay is not required) or non-exempt (meaning overtime is required). The traditional exemptions include, administrative, executive, professional, outside sales, and computer employees. Deciding which employees fit into the exemptions can be tricky. The DOL has issued fact sheets for each of the exempt classifications that may be helpful in making the decision. You should review the fact sheets in light of the employees' job duties to determine whether you have classified employees correctly.

 

2.      Classification of independent contractors: Another major classification problem that the DOL is cracking down on is classifying individuals as independent contractors rather than employees. The DOL has also issued a fact sheet to help determine whether an individual qualifies as an independent contractor or not.

 

3.      Breaks: Employers may, but are not required to provide breaks to employees. Additionally, breaks in excess of 30 minutes can be unpaid. If you provide an unpaid lunch break (or other 30 minute break) an employee must be completely relieved of their duties. The problem arises when employees fail to take the designated break. If an employee fails to take the designated break, you are required to pay that person for the time worked, which may result in overtime hours for that employee. It is important that you monitor and enforce any unpaid lunch break that you provide.

 

4.      Bonuses: Bonuses paid to non-exempt employees may need to be included in determining the employee's regular rate for the purposes of determining the appropriate overtime rate. Discretionary bonuses are not included in an employee's regular rate.

 

5.      Policies restricting overtime: Policies restricting overtime or requiring authorization for overtime are lawful. Policies such as these, however, do not exempt an employer from paying overtime if an employee works over 40 hours in a workweek. An employer may discipline an employee for working overtime or not getting authorization, but must still pay the employee for all hours worked in the workweek.

 

There are a number of other problems that many employers face when applying the FLSA, particularly relating to determining "hours worked". If you have questions about any of the listed problems or potential problems you face you should contact your attorney.

Interference with an Inheritance

 A recent ruling issued by the Iowa Court of Appeals involved an issue of a claim for tortious interference with an inheritance.  The ruling dealt with when does the statute of limitations period start for such a claim.

Here, the deceased had previously provided for her brothers in her will.  Subsequently, she changed her will to leave her estate to her niece, made significant gifts to her niece, and changed certain accounts to POD (Payable on Death) to her niece and her husband.  The deceased's brothers discovered some of the changes and gifts, but did not see a copy of the new will.  Several years later, the deceased passed away and one brother (the other died previously) contested the will and also the lifetime transfers based on the claim of interference with an inheritance.  The estate responded by indicating that it was too late...they knew about the transfers to the niece years before and didn't do anything.  The trial court agreed that the statute of limitations prohibited that claim.

In reversing, the Iowa Court of Appeals stated that as the family was not allowed to see the updated will, there is a question as to when they knew about the cash transfers and there is a question of when the claim actually accrued.  While I'm struggling to understand the Court's rationale, it appears that the lack of knowledge of the provisions of the will prevented the family of knowing whether their expected inheritance was affected.  When the will was admitted to probate, then they became aware that they had been disinherited.

This case is representative of a growing trend of cases involving interference with inheritance in Iowa.  The use of alternative methods to transfer assets is becoming more and more common and can short-circuit the estate plan.  I will be presenting additional information about this topic in the near future.