Trust Termination in Iowa Restricted

Prior posts on this site have dealt with terminating a trust or breaking a trust in Iowa.  A recent case from the Iowa Court of Appeals further clarified the ability of beneficiaries to terminate a trust in Iowa under the Iowa Trust Code.  In the Matter of the Trust under the Last Will and Testament of Mary E. Weitzel, Mom executed a will which provided that her assets would stay in trust for her life, then upon daughter's death, the balance of the estate would pass to daughter's children (mom's grand kids).  The will contained a relatively common provision, called a "spendthrift" provision, which prevented the daughter or the creditors of the daughter from getting access to the trust principal.  The daughter claimed that the creditor issues that once existed were no longer an issue, and thus the spendthrift provision was no longer needed.  Apparently, daughter and sons didn't care for the bank as the trustee and having restrictions in their access to the trust assets, so they sought to have the trust terminated. 

The Iowa Trust Code permits termination of a trust if all of the beneficiaries consent and there remains no further material purpose of the trust.  The question in this case focused on whether the spendthrift provision constituted a material purpose, thereby not permitting the trust to be terminated even if all of the beneficiaries consent to the early termination.  The ruling from the Iowa Court of Appeals was that the spendthrift provision, with the facts of this case, was a material purpose and would not permit the trust to be terminated before the trust was directed to be terminated.

This ruling further emphasizes the direction that Iowa courts are going in preserving trusts.  Some other states are taking a different approach in adopting a flexible approach permitting the termination of trusts when all of the beneficiaries consent.

Rather than terminating a trust, what if the beneficiaries sought to simply amend the provisions of the trust?

Update to Posthumously Conceived Child Social Security Benefits

In a follow-up to a recent post, Jason Clayworth of the Des Moines Register recently updated the situation concerning a young girl's application for social security benefits as a result of her father's death.  A federal judge has overturned the rejection of benefits and thus permits her to receive benefits.  The article continues to point out that legislators are examining long overdue updates to the Iowa statute to address these types of situations.  The Social Security Administration has until January 11, 2010 to appeal.

The complexities that are involved in cases like this are challenging.  A recent Probate Section meeting of the Iowa State Bar began to examine some of the issues and an approach to take with this issue.  The discussion revealed that there is a split in the probate section as a result of numerous questions and possible approaches.  Beyond the basic philosophical question of is this "right", there other other related matters beyond social security benefits.  Can the father's wishes restrict future usage of his genetic material?  Does he need to sign a written consent to authorize the use after his death? Should that consent be notarized? How far in the future will this material be permitted to be utilized?  How will this impact settlement of estates and determination of heirs?  How does this issue impact review of real property titles in abstract examinations?

I look forward to how the Iowa legislature approaches this issue in the spring and hopefully they consider all of the interrelated issues.